The Forbes India Leadership Awards (FILA) is a celebration of leaders who were able to redefine and, or transform their businesses during a crisis—a pandemic
Russia’s invasion of Ukraine last fortnight brought to the fore, among many things, a few perceptions and myths about leaders and leadership. Vladimir Putin is for many the marauding ‘strong leader’, with reckless and evil designs on a helpless neighbour. A section of columnists was quick to paint US President Joe Biden as the ‘weak leader’ for being unable to effectively intervene.
The idea here is not to get into the complex geopolitics of the situation and justify either Putin’s aggression or the West’s arguably tepid retaliation. Rather, the effort here is to explore the myth of strong (and weak) leadership—and not necessarily of the political variety.
This is, after all, Forbes India’s annual issue on leadership, in which we honour the best leaders—from entrepreneurs to professional head honchos—on the domestic business landscape. The Forbes India Leadership Awards (FILA) is a celebration of leaders who were able to redefine and/or transform their businesses during a crisis—a pandemic.
To be sure, ‘redefining’ and ‘transformational’ leaders may be more effective than those we tend to refer to as ‘strong’—that’s how Archie Brown, author of The Myth of the Strong Leader (2014, Penguin Random House), sees it. Brown’s universe is largely political, but a lot of what he writes is applicable to leadership in other areas, from business to sports.
A strong leader, as Brown sets the context, “is generally taken to mean a leader who concentrates a lot of power in his or her hands… Placing great power in the hands of one person is inappropriate in a democracy, and it would be an unusually lacklustre government in which one individual was best qualified… to have the last word on everything”.