Their decisions are more closely scrutinised than the PM’s cabinet picks. Kiran More, former Chairman of India’s cricket selection committee, gives us a peek behind the scenes.
How strong is the pressure to prop the region from which the selector comes?
A lot. People from various associations call up and ask why their players have not been chosen; there is emotional pressure as you are the representative of a particular Zone. But your loyalty has to be for the Indian cricket team.
How big is the role of the captain during selection?
The captain plays an extremely vital role; it is he who has to be out in the field with the team. We make sure that we accommodate his views. But the selectors are the ones who spot the talent and have seen most of the players play, and therefore have a perspective that the captain cannot. We are responsible for making sure that there is a strong bench. So sometimes we have to put our foot down.
Do selectors pick players who put pressure in unconventional ways, bordering on foul play?
Players who have a slightly different character or an attitude do tend to have an edge. It is useful to have some one like Sreesanth, Harbhajan or Yuvraj in the team because of the kind of aggression that they have. Being nice is not always an asset. But this certainly cannot be the major reason that a player is chosen.
Did the selection committee ever consider dropping Sachin for poor form?
No. We have, especially in 2004-05, considered resting him to protect him from injury. He was at that time, passing through a bad health patch. But never for any other reason.
How much should a selector be paid if it has to become a truly independent job?
The job is demanding, takes a physical toll, with travel throughout the year. And the person has to have a strong character and a lot of people skills. I would say that Rs 40 lakh a year is a fair amount.
Typically, how many chances does a youngster have?
Eight to nine matches, which is a fair duration to judge performance.
Is international cricket experience necessary for selectors?
Not at all. A player with 15 to 20 years of Ranji Trophy matches is sufficiently skilled to spot a good, talented player.
Why did the selectors not back Sourav Ganguly in the feud with Greg Chappell?
There was no question of backing Greg Chappell. He had made some suggestions as he thought fit, but the selectors independently thought that it was time to drop Sourav for a number of reasons. Chappell had no right to decide who should or should not be selected.
Why did Rahul Dravid quit the captaincy just when it looked like he was going to be at that job for a few years?
That is a question that only Rahul can answer. He is a dear friend, but I can’t really speak on his behalf.
(Compiled by Divya Subramaniam)
Next issue, our Insider will be an author. If you want to know what it takes to write a book or how do you get over writer's block, email us — ask.forbesindia@network18online.com — or write to Ask The Insider at our office address, and we’ll get it for you. You’re also welcome to send us suggestions on the kind of “insiders” you’d like to hear from in the future.
(This story appears in the 22 January, 2010 issue of Forbes India. To visit our Archives, click here.)