A group of individualistic, creative, egotistically inclined people in a tripped-out cocktail of emotion, psychedelia and smit make for a heady mix
Sex, drugs and rock ’n’ roll—that orgiastic triad of use and abuse— have been celebrated as bedfellows since the 1960s, when the Age of Aquarius heralded an era of free love, hemp-carrying longhairs, artisanal bongs, charred bras and loud guitars. That the feedback-fuelled rebellion was accompanied by lip-smacking tales of hedonism and hallucination made the lore so much more deliciously engaging. The allure of the rock ’n’ roll band was irresistible. It was merely a matter of time that the movie industry saw the consummation of band and film. Documentaries were the first form, capturing real-life action and drama. Woodstock, about the epical three-day, 300,000-strong music festival-cum-bacchanalian protest, projected messianic images of musicians as deliverers from convention. The Last Waltz, Martin Scorsese’s doc about the legend-studded final concert of a band called The Band, showed the human side of musicians—as friends, collaborators, artistes and craftsmen.
Feature films were the inevitable follow-up. The idea of a band instantly throws up the prospect of drama. At its heart, you’ve got a group of individualistic, creatively driven, egotistically inclined interpreters of a highly subjective art form. Dress them up in outré garb and body art, toss in a potpourri of intoxicants and add a few groupies, and you’ve got a tripped-out cocktail of emotion, psychedelia and smut—what’s not to hook you?
Singers and guitar players as sex symbols, draped in groupies while touring the world in private jets bearing band logos, is all well and good for magazine spreads and biopics. Not everyone’s The Rolling Stones. The reality for most bands is quite the opposite.
(This story appears in the Sept-Oct 2014 issue of ForbesLife India. To visit our Archives, click here.)