Some of the most fascinating topics covered this week are: Investing (Detecting business fraud), Economy (Case for negative interest rates), Integrity (Tim Cook says no to FBI's backdoor entry to iPhone), Business (Can Neobanks succeed in India?) and Technology (Big Tech got even bigger in the Covid-19 era)
Image: Shutterstock
At Ambit, we spend a lot of time reading articles that cover a wide gamut of topics, ranging from zeitgeist to futuristic, and encapsulate them in our weekly ‘Ten Interesting Things’ product. Some of the most fascinating topics covered this week are: Investing (Detecting business fraud), Economy (Case for negative interest rates), Integrity (Tim Cook says no to FBI’s backdoor entry to iPhone), Business (Can Neobanks succeed in India?) and Technology (Big Tech got even bigger in the Covid-19 era).
Here are the ten most interesting pieces that we read this week, ended May 15, 2020:
1) Bad arguments and how to avoid them [Source: Farnam Street]
When being powerfully persuasive matters, it’s important that we don’t use bad arguments that prevent useful debate instead of furthering it. To do this, it’s useful to know some common ways people remove the possibility of a meaningful discussion. This piece elaborates on three common types of bad arguments; 1) straw man; 2) hollow man and 3) iron man. What is the purpose of debate? Most of us, if asked, would say it’s about helping someone with an incorrect, harmful idea see the light. It’s an act of kindness. It’s about getting to the truth. But the way we tend to engage in debate contradicts our supposed intentions. Any time we engage in debate, we need to be honest about our intentions.
If you want to have useful, productive debates, it’s vital to avoid using bad arguments. In Intuition Pumps and Other Tools for Thinking, the philosopher Daniel Dennett offers some general guidelines for using the principle of charity, formulated by social psychologist and game theorist Anatol Rapoport: 1) You should attempt to re-express your target’s position so clearly, vividly, and fairly that your target says, “Thanks, I wish I’d thought of putting it that way.” 2) You should list any points of agreement (especially if they are not matters of general or widespread agreement). 3) You should mention anything you have learned from your target. 4) Only then are you permitted to say so much as a word of rebuttal or criticism.