Are we all destined to stay at home under a duvet for the rest of eternity? France-based journalist and author Vincent Cocquebert analyses our apparent need to withdraw in today's society, and explores the origins of the phenomenon
Image: Julia Gerasina / Getty Images
The pandemic took away many of our freedoms. However, now that we're starting to be free again, we're tending to stay within our comfort zone. But are we all destined to stay at home under a duvet for the rest of eternity? Vincent Cocquebert describes this phenomenon in his book "La Civilisation du cocon" [Cocoon Civilization] published by Editions Arkhê in March 2021. The France-based journalist analyzes our apparent need to withdraw in today's society, and explores the origins of the phenomenon.
You started working on your book some time before the pandemic. Were you already observing a kind of withdrawal in society or does it date back even further?
In my opinion, this was already foreseen in the working classes of the 1980s. During this Thatcher/Reagan decade, the values of individual, materialistic success were valued, with the promise of modernity and of being the driving force of one's own life. Except that this promise of emancipation is difficult to achieve for a whole part of the population. So, from the beginning of the 1980s, people withdrew into their suburban homes, gardened and stayed put. This was the beginning of a strong trend in the suburbs and in rural areas.
Now that many of us are back working in the office, we've realized that we like people -- but not that much -- because they're loud, and they're there ... in short, they're human.
That's what's interesting about the relationship with working from home. We like it, we want it, but it creates anxiety, depression and a feeling of isolation. That's the trap of this cocoon civilization: it's a false sense of security that makes it harder to get back into civilization. "I'd like to see my colleagues while maintaining this space, this bubble." In all the behaviors that have to do with this idea, we see a dialectic between the inside and the outside. And this generates negative effects.