Most real estate donors are those with large township-like business park projects
The list of individuals and companies donating via electoral bonds has got many to question why they would do so. In some cases, it is alleged to have been quid pro quo for permissions granted or prosecutions not pursued or policy changes.
But the case of real estate, industry watchers argue, is a little more complex. This is on account of the fact that the industry remains very local. Builders rarely transcend state boundaries and even with cities, they have their zones earmarked through a gentleman’s agreement. When they venture across states, it is usually through tying up with a local partner who acts as their eyes and ears on the ground. National players mostly lend their brand.
The Rs631 crore donated by well-known developers DLF, K Raheja Corp, Prestige, Omkar and Keystone (Rustomjee), among others, pales in comparison to the nearly Rs1,232 crore donated by the top donor Megha Engineering. Industry watchers point to the fact that while these businesses need help to get going, the nature of their interactions with the authorities is different.
First, at the land stage, permissions are mostly on account of the change in the use of the land. Developers aggregate parcels and then apply for them to be designated for non-agricultural use. Here, the local unit of the ruling party plays a strong role and these deals are usually done with the locally elected strongman. Often, he or she brooks no interference from the party.
Next comes the building permissions. These are usually done through the local municipal corporation and here, money changes hands in cash. They are also other favours to be granted—like say a discounted flat to the local corporate, MLA or MP. Here too developers prefer to deal at the local level.