No specific project or initiative favouring any of the five poll-bound states was announced. But multiple initiatives indirectly benefiting the voters have come into play
Unlike last year when states like West Bengal and Tamil Nadu were given preference for infrastructure development and social schemes
Image: Shutterstock
All eyes were on what specific steps Nirmala Sitharaman would announce for the five states where elections commence this month onwards. Unlike the pre-Budget expectations of it being an election budget, no specific project or initiative favouring any of the five states—Uttar Pradesh (UP), Punjab, Manipur, Uttarakhand and Goa—was announced. However, multiple initiatives indirectly benefiting the voters have come into play.
The focus of the Budget is on economic revival. Issues relating to agriculture, unemployment, women, health and infrastructure are the key focus areas in the states heading to assembly elections beginning February 7. “The focus on digitisation, energy, and skilling further gives us hope that the government is taking a long-term growth-oriented outlook. The only thing that investors missed was any measures to restore their confidence and upend the recent trend of decelerating foreign portfolio investments and FDI,†says Kriti Upadhyaya, associate fellow with the Wadhwani Chair, US-India Policy Studies at the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) in Washington DC. “It was a mature move that the budget speech resisted the urge to dole out sops to poll-bound states. I was surprised to not even find the states mentioned in the budget speech, except very fleetingly,†she adds.
Sitharaman started her fourth Budget presentation by saying, "With our provision for public investment in the last Budget, this Budget continues to provide multiplier effect which will benefit youth farmers, SCs, STs, women and poor.â€
“There are seemingly no special sops in the Budget only for the poll-going states, but the MSP was the big one, and it will probably influence a lot of farmers in Western UP and Panjab. There was no economic rationale for such a steep increase in allocation to MSP—only a political rationale, for the forthcoming elections,†says Sanjeev Sabhlok, economist, former IAS officer and an advisor to the Swatantra Bharat Party (SBP).