By Samidha Jain | Jun 14, 2023
While companies are trying to adopt newer ways to implement diversity and inclusion at workplaces, employees are not fully satisfied
[CAPTION]A file photo of Future Generali India Insurance staffers participating in a rainbow flag flash mob at their office, Mumbai, Maharashtra, June 17, 2022. Image: Ashish Vaishnav/SOPA/LightRocket via Getty Images[/CAPTION]
Jaspal Singh, 27, who works with one of the top audit houses in India, is worried that he and his fellow queer employees won’t be received as “normal” if they came out at their office. He says the policies for LGBTQ+ employees at the workplace are not part of the onboarding process, and are hence unclear. “There are a few rudimentary procedures such as employees being able to raise concerns to the internal committees. We are concerned, however, that we will not be received as perfectly capable if we wore our pride on our sleeves. So we conceal our sexual orientation and pass off as straight to avoid any conflict,” says Singh.
In India, and also the world over, many organisations are trying hard to sell themselves as an inclusive workplace with gender-neutral policies, awareness sessions, insurance and medical policies for the queer people etc. But, at a team or an individual level, the reality is at odds.
_RSS_Fatima Khan (name changed), working as an HR consultant in the Diversity & Inclusions team at a multinational conglomerate, feels controlling the everyday work environment to ensure zero discrimination is an issue. “If we hire someone from the queer community, it is difficult to ensure they won’t face subtle or passive forms of discrimination. We are trying to take this up with inclusivity sessions and awareness workshops and I think more than policies, we need more of implementation and execution,” says Khan, who identifies as pansexual.
Indeed, walking the talk is difficult for organisations. Khan mentions that, as a part of the diversity and inclusion team, the current representation of women and specially-abled employees at their workplace is itself a work-in-progress and hence branching out to the queer community has taken a backseat.
Aparna Mittal, an equality, diversity and inclusion advisor, and a corporate lawyer with over 19 years of experience explains the reason behind this gap. Most companies have not fully understood the importance of inclusive hiring and retaining a diverse demography at the organisation, she says. The understanding of why diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) at workplaces is important and the multiple diversities / facets of DEI, is still quite primitive. “The first challenge is for people to understand that DEI is relevant, it needs to be done, and then how it should be done, only then we can come to implementation,” says Mittal.
Based on a personal experience at a previous workplace, Singh shares how policies for the queer community being in place don’t matter as much because HR individuals aren’t very keen on resolving them. “I personally was at the receiving end of crude queer jokes after a co-worker at one of my previous jobs joined Grindr as a ‘joke’ and found my profile. When talking to him one-on-one didn't help, I had approached my HR who was quite dismissive. His continuous taunts ended up with me resigning from the organisation as soon as I could.”
According to a study conducted by the Human Rights Commission in 2018, 96 percent of trans persons are denied jobs and 92 percent are denied participation in any economic activity. As per a World Bank study conducted in 2014, up to 1.7 percent of India’s GDP is lost out every year through LGBTQ+ exclusion. More recently, a 2022 study conducted by HR consulting firm Randstad India revealed that 53 percent of Indian companies do not have career-development opportunities for people from the LGBTQ+ community. It further revealed that only 9.5 percent of the surveyed organisations have made extremely significant efforts to be LGBTQ+ inclusive.
Also see: Pride and no prejudice
Having extensive hands-on experience as the founder of Samāna Centre for Gender, Policy and Law, a consultancy focused on Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI), Environmental, Social & Governance (ESG) and Prevention of Sexual Harassment (PoSH), Mittal believes that everything, from a small local neighbourhood store to a big conglomerate or MNC, is part of corporate India, and with this imagination of a real corporate India, we haven't even gone beyond 5-10 percent with regards to LGBTQ+ inclusion work and policies. “Work is definitely happening at a good pace now, but it is happening in limited pockets,” she adds.
Twenty-four year old Megha Choudhary, who works in a renowned food-delivery platform, says, “There are basic HR policies in place but there is nothing which is specifically queer-centric. There is a general acceptance within the company, yet there are a few people who lack awareness and often make fun of the community and its elements, and try to pass it off by claiming to be joking.” Singh agrees. According to him, the heterosexual view of the policies is that they are adequate and implemented with parity, however a queer viewpoint reveals there is a glaring difference between what is intended and what is actually executed.
The Indian government and the justice system have passed several landmark judgements in favour of the queer community. Some include the 2014 judgement where the Supreme Court (SC) recognised transgender people as the ‘third gender’ and upheld that discrimination based on gender identity is constitutionally prohibited. Then, in 2018, the SC decriminalised Section 377, and, in 2019, the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act, 2019 (Transgender Act) was passed by both the Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha, prohibiting both government and private bodies from denying or terminating employment or discriminating against transgender people.
According to Mittal, while there are lofty ideals of equality and non-discrimination enshrined in the Constitution, their implementation, especially in the private sector remains low, and India does not have comprehensive micro laws that convert these ideals into implementable laws or frameworks. “In terms of the legal gaps, I think a lot of the real, practical day to day rights—right to marry and for legal recognition of the marriage, right to medical insurance for the same sex partner, rights for a homosexual couple to adopt a child—a lot of these personal rights are still not available to the LGBT community entirely and that remains an area where they are continuing their pursuit for equality and justice.”